绿色经济对农村就业的影响外文翻译中英文.docx
- 文档编号:16831143
- 上传时间:2023-07-17
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:25
- 大小:37.39KB
绿色经济对农村就业的影响外文翻译中英文.docx
《绿色经济对农村就业的影响外文翻译中英文.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《绿色经济对农村就业的影响外文翻译中英文.docx(25页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
绿色经济对农村就业的影响外文翻译中英文
绿色经济对农村就业的影响外文翻译中英文2019
英文
Theimpactofgreeneconomymeasuresonruralemployment:
Greenjobsinfarms
İlkayGailhard,ŠtefanBojnec
Abstract
Inthe circulareconomy concept,besidesprotectingtheenvironment,greenpolicymeasuresprovideessentialeconomicbenefitsthroughresourcesecurity,economicstability,andthecreationofgreenjobs.Thisstudycentresitsattentiononthelabouruseaspectofthecirculareconomyandaimstoexaminethepotentialforgreeneconomymeasurestocreategreenjobsintheagriculturesector.Asamethodologicalapproach,wecombine“top-down”and“bottom-up”analysesofthegreeneconomyexperienceofSlovenia,whereagri-environmentalmeasures(AEM)playanessentialroleintheSlovenianruraldevelopmentprogramme(2007–2014),withthehighestamountofsubsidiesperunitofoutputamongthe10newEuropeanUnionMemberStates.TheresultsshowthatanAEMadoptionofgreenpolicymeasuresbyverylargedairyandfieldcropfarmssignificantlyincreasestotallabouruse:
whileforfieldcropfarmsthisincreaseisinhiredlabour,fordairyfarmsthisincreaseisinfamilylabour.Whilehiredandfamilylabourperformassubstitutesforverylargedairyfarms,theyperformascomplementsforverylargefieldcropfarms.Thepresentstudysuggestsfurtherstepstowardsidentifyingthegreeneconomymeasuresthatareneededtocreategreenjobsintheagriculturesectorforruralyouth.
Keywords:
Greeneconomy,Circulareconomy,Agri-environmentalmeasures,Greenjobs,Farms,Farmaccountancydatanetwork,Slovenia
Introduction
Thegreenjobconcepthasstartedtobeusedbyscholarsfollowingtheriseofthegreeneconomyparadigm(Martinez-Fernandezet al.,2010, EspostoandAnnakis,2016).The UnitedNationsEnvironmentProgramme (UNEP,2008)definesgreenjobsasworkinagricultural,manufacturing, researchanddevelopment,administrative,andserviceactivitiesthatcontributesubstantiallytopreservingorrestoringenvironmentalquality.
Thegreeneconomyhasbeenidentifiedasasustainableglobalgreengrowth trajectory (OECD,2013),andintheEuropeanUnion(EU),measuresandlegislativeproposalshavebeenadoptedwiththeGreenActionPlantosupportthetransitiontowardsamore circulareconomy (EC,2014a).
Thecirculareconomyconcepthasdeep-rootedorigins,whichgainedimportancestaringfromthelate1970sbyacademics,businesses,andpolicymakers,andinvolvesthecirculationofproductsandresourcesinuseforaslongaspossiblethroughreusing,repairing,refurbishingandrecycling(EC,2014b).Besidesprotectingtheenvironment,thecirculationofproductsandresourcesprovidesessentialbenefitsthroughincreasedresourcesecurity,economicstability,andthecreationofemploymentopportunitiesviatheexpansionofsectors(MitchellandMorgan,2015).
Intheliterature,thereareseveralstudieswhichexaminethesituationofgreenjobsattheEUlevelandreviewthefindingsontherelationshipbetweenenvironmentalpoliciesandemployment(Aceleanu,2015, Pociovălișteanuet al.,2015, GeandZhi,2016).However,itisdifficulttoaccuratelyconcludealinkbetweenenvironmentalpoliciesandemployment,becausedifferentmethodsareusedtoassessthenumberofgreenjobs,andthedataavailableforcertainsectorsislimited(CoxandFoley,2013).Overall,previousfindingshighlightbothadirectandindirecteffectofenvironmentalpoliciesonemployment(Eastwoodet al.,1995).Inparticular,apositiveeffectofenvironmentalpoliciesongreenjobcreationisfoundinrenewableenergysectors(EngelandDaniel,2009).
Thisstudycentresitsattentionontheterminalaspectofthecirculareconomywithafocusontheagriculturesector,andaimstoexaminewhethergreeneconomymeasuresproducegreenjobsatthefarmlevel.Regardingtheagriculturesector,EUfundingisavailabletohelpMemberStates(MS)withemploymentopportunitiesandchallengesrelatedtothetransitiontoagreeneconomy.OneofthemoreimportantfundinginstrumentsoftheEuropeanAgriculturalFundforRuralDevelopment(EAFRD)involvesinvestmentsinagriculture, forestry,theenvironment,ruralbusinessandinfrastructure,includinginvestmentsinrenewableenergyandenergyefficiency,resourcemanagementandinnovation.
Agri-environmentalmeasures(AEM)areakeyelementfortheintegrationofenvironmentalconcernsinEAFRD,anddesignedtoencouragefarmerstoprotecttheenvironmentontheir farmland bypayingthemfortheprovisionofenvironmentallyrespectfulproduction,andenvironmentalservices.Regardingenvironmentallyrespectfulproduction,AEMswererecognizedasthemostrelevantpaymentfororganicproduction,duetotheirsignificantsupportinallEUmemberstates.However,asanalternativetoorganicfarmingpractices,therearealsopaymentscoveredbyAEMsthatmaybenearlyashighasorganicproductionpaymentswithlessstrictenvironmentalstandards(e.g.,integratedfarming).Regardingtheprovisionofenvironmentalservices,AEMsaredesignedatthenational,regional,orterritoriallevelinordertoadapttoparticularfarmingsystemsandspecificenvironmentalconditions(e.g.,thepreservationofhistoricalfeatures,andconservationofhigh-valuehabitatsinfarmland).
Fromapolicyimplementationperspective,theadoptionofAEMsbyfarmersontheirfarmlandmakesgreenmeasuresatargetedtoolforachievinggreengrowthinagriculture.TheimpactofAEMsonruralemploymentevolutionisakeypolicyissueintheongoingdebateon CommonAgriculturalPolicy reforms.Previousstudies,whichfocussedonanEUscale,demonstratethatCommonAgriculturalPolicyfunding,particular Pillar II,whichincludesAEMs,contributestoemploymentmaintenanceinbothfarmingandnon-farmingsectors,andservesasapermanentregional“stimulus”package(Mattaset al.,2011).However,veryfewcountrieshaveexploitedthepotentialforgreeneconomymeasurestocreategreenemploymentintheagriculturesector(OECD,2013).
Fromapolicyinterventionperspective,governmentscanuseavarietyofapproachestoachievegreenmeasurepolicyobjectives.Thesecanbeclassifiedbythedegreeofgovernmentintervention,rangingfromnointerventiontoa commandandcontrolapproach(Roussetet al.,2015).Paymentperhectarecouldbedeliveredthroughauctions(e.g.,BushtenderprogrammeinAustralia),andviagrantstocoverinvestmentsinenvironmentallyfriendlyequipment,investmentssuchassometaxconcessionprogrammesinCanada,JapanandAustralia,andstructuralpaymentprogrammesintheEUwithintheRuralDevelopmentProgramme(RDP)(Vojtech,2010).IntheEU,AEMsarevoluntaryandrelyentirelyonthewillingnessoffarmerstoparticipate.AEMscompensatefarmersforvoluntarilyenteringa5-yearprogrammecommitmenttocarryoutmeasuresconsideredtobeofbenefittotheenvironment.FarmersreceivepaymentsthatprovidecompensationforadditionalcostsandincomeforegoneasaresultofapplyingmeasuresinlinewiththeconventionofAEM.
Theexpansionofvoluntary-basedstructuredpublicinterventionintheimplementationofgreenmeasuresraisedthestudyquestionof“Towhatextentdovoluntarypolicyreformsthataimtoachievegreengrowthinagricultureaffecttheemploymentstructure,especiallyon-farmlabouruseinEuropeanruralregions?
”,withSloveniaasacasestudy.
Previousstudiesonthegreeneconomyhaveusedagreengrowthframeworkwithdiversetheoriessuchasecologicaleconomics,thecleanerproductionapproach,andcirculareconomy(Loiseauet al.,2016, DAmatoet al.,2017).Despitethefactthatthecirculareconomyapproachisgrowinginthebusinesscontext,therearefewacademicstudiesthatfocusongreenemploymentin agribusiness.
Inourstudy,thegreengrowthframeworkisbasedonideasfrom agroecology,andassociatedwiththeideasingreenemployment.Ourinterestinthecirculareconomyliesinitspotentialtouselandandothernaturalresourcesmoreefficiently,andpromotesustainabledevelopment,whichfullyvaluestheenvironment.Inthescopeofourresearchquestion,thecirculareconomyisahighlyrelevantconceptwithwhichtoexaminethesustainableandsociallyresponsibleagribusinessintherurallabourmarket,includingitspotentialtocreategreenjobsand“greenskills”.
Ashighlightedby Consoliet al.(2016),regardlessofthesectordivision,greenjobsexhibitsignificantdifferencesfromnon-greenjobsintermsofskillsandhumancapital:
greenjobsaremainlycharacterizedbyhigherlevelsofnon-routinecognitiveskills,ahigherdependenceonformaleducation,workexperienceandjobtraining.Regardingtheagriculturesector,asdiscussedby Horvatinčićet al.(2016),farmerscanonlyachievegreenskillsthroughinstitutionalprovisionofagriculturalknowledgeongreendevelopmentstandards,suchasconservation,protectionandsustainableuseoftheenvironment.Thisknowledgecanleadtoimprovementinagricultural competitiveness andthequalityofagriculturalproduction.
Assessingthejobcreationpotentialofgreenagriculturalpoliciesisnotstraightforward,duetothedifficultyofmeasuringgrossversusnetjobcreation.Thisisparticularlytrueformeasuringthegreenjobpotential,duetothewiderangeofconceptualchallenges,includingthevariousdefinitionsof“green”,anddiverseunderstandingsof“greenemployment”,aswellasempiricalconsiderationssuchasdifferencesbetween“bottom-up”and“topdown”approachestogreenemployment(Violaet al.,2016).
PreviousliteraturehasmainlyfocusedonthequalitativeregionalcasestudiesbyassociationofCommonAgriculturalPolicyexpenditurewithemployment(PetrickandZier,2011, Mattaset al.,2011, Fieldsend,2011, NordinandBlomqui
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 绿色 经济 农村 就业 影响 外文 翻译 中英文