回稿范文.docx
- 文档编号:17465319
- 上传时间:2023-07-25
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:14
- 大小:24.73KB
回稿范文.docx
《回稿范文.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《回稿范文.docx(14页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
回稿范文
范文二:
如何回复英文论文编辑部的修改意见
望对大家有帮助
1.
DearProf.XXXX,
ThankyouverymuchforyourletterandthecommentsfromtherefereesaboutourpapersubmittedtoXXXX(MSNumberXXXX).
Wehavecheckedthemanuscriptandreviseditaccordingtothecomments.Wesubmitheretherevisedmanuscriptaswellasalistofchanges.
Ifyouhaveanyquestionaboutthispaper,pleasedon’thesitatetoletmeknow.
Sincerelyyours,
Dr.XXXX
ResponsetoReviewer1:
Thanksforyourcommentsonourpaper.Wehaverevisedourpaperaccordingtoyourcomments:
1.XXXXXXX
2.XXXXXXX
2.
DearProfessor***,
Re:
An***RotatingRigid-flexibleCoupledSystem(No.:
JSV-D-06-***)
by***
Manythanksforyouremailof24Jun2006,regardingtherevisionandadviceoftheabovepaperinJSV.Overallthecommentshavebeenfair,encouragingandconstructive.Wehavelearnedmuchfromit.
Aftercarefullystudyingthereviewer’commentsandyouradvice,wehavemadecorrespondingchangestothepaper.Ourresponseofthecommentsisenclosed.
Ifyouneedanyotherinformation,pleasecontactmeimmediatelybyemail.Myemailaccountis***,andTel.is***,andFaxis+***.
Yourssincerely,
Detailedresponsetoreviewer’scommentsandAsianEditor’sadvice
Overallthecommentshavebeenfair,encouragingandconstructive.Wehavelearnedmuchfromit.Althoughthereviewer’scommentsaregenerallypositive,wehavecarefullyproofreadthemanuscriptandedititasfollowing.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)(5)
(6)
Besidestheabovechanges,wehavecorrectedsomeexpressionerrors.
Thankyouverymuchfortheexcellentandprofessionalrevisionofourmanuscript.
3.
Themanuscriptisrevisedsubmission(×××-××××)withnewlineandpagenumbersinthetext,somegrammarandspellingerrorshadalsobeencorrected.Furthermore,therelevantregulationshadbeenmadeintheoriginalmanuscriptaccordingtothecommentsofreviewers,andthemajorrevisedportionsweremarkedinredbold.Wealsorespondedpointbypointtoeachreviewercommentsaslistedbelow,alongwithaclearindicationofthelocationoftherevision.
Hopethesewillmakeitmoreacceptableforpublication.
ListofMajorChanges:
1).........
2).........
3).........
ResponsetoReviewers:
1).........
2).........
3).........
ResponsetoReviewerXX
Weverymuchappreciatethecarefulreadingofourmanuscriptandvaluablesuggestionsofthereviewer.Wehavecarefullyconsideredthecommentsandhaverevisedthemanuscriptaccordingly.Thecommentscanbesummarizedasfollows:
1)XX
2)XX
Detailedresponses
1)XX
2)XX
4.
DeareditorXX
Wehavereceivedthecommentsonourmanuscriptentitled“XX”byXX.Accordingtothecommentsofthereviewers,wehaverevisedourmanuscript.Therevisedmanuscriptandthedetailedresponsestothecommentsoftheonereviewerareattached.
Sincerelyyours,
XX
5.
ResponsetoReviewerA
ReviewerAverykindlycontactedmedirectly,andrevealedhimselftobeProfessorDr.Hans-GeorgGeissleroftheUniversityofLeipzig.IwrotehimageneralresponsetobothreviewsinJanuary2000,followedbytheseresponsestospecificpoints,bothhisown,andthoseoftheotherreviewer.
ResponsetoSpecificPoints
Whatfollowsisabriefandcursorydiscussionofthevariousissuesraisedbyyourselfandtheotherreviewer.Ifyoushouldreviseyourjudgmentofthevalidityofthetheory,thesepointswillbeaddressedatgreaterlengthinanewversionofthepaperthatIwouldresubmittoPsychologicalReview.
ResponsetoSpecificPoints-ReviewerA:
Inpart
(1)ofyourcritiquethemajorcomplaintisthatnotheoryispresented,whichwas
discussedabove.Youcontinue
Inpart
(2)(a)ofyourcritiqueyousay
demonstratesmoreinsightthanexplicitlystatedinassumptionsanddrawnconclusions
InthewordsofWolfgangK?
hler:
(1961,p.7)
WolfgangK?
hler(K?
hler1923p.64)
Insection
(2)(b)ofyourcritiqueyoucomplainthat
ThePDPapproachdoesaddresstheissueofemergence,butsincethebasiccomputationalunitoftheneuralnetworkmodelisahard-wiredreceptivefield,thistheorysuffersallthelimitationsofatemplatetheory.ThesameholdsforGrossberg's
orientation,theARTmodelcouldnotcompletethatpatternspecifictoitsorientation.TheHRmodelontheotherhandoffersadifferentanduniqueprincipleofrepresentation,inwhichtop-downactivationofthehigherlevelnodecancompleteapartialorambiguousinputpatterninthespecificorientationatwhichitappears,butthatsameprimingwouldcompletethepatterndifferentlyifitappearedinadifferentorientation.Thisgeneralizationinrecognition,butspecificationincompletion,isapropertythatisuniquetotheharmonicresonancerepresentation.
Kuhnobservesthattheoldparadigmcanalwaysbereformulatedtoaccountforanyparticularphenomenonaddressedbythenewparadigm,justasthePtolomaicearth-centeredcosmologycouldaccountforthemotionsoftheplanetstoarbitraryprecision,givenenoughnestedcyclesandepicyclesofthecrystalspheres.Similarly,aconventionalneuralnetworkmodelcanalwaysbecontrivedtoexhibitthesamefunctionalbehaviorofgeneralizedrecognitionbutspecificcompletiondescribedabove,butonlybypostulatinganimplausiblearrangementofspatialreceptivefields.InthiscasethatwouldrequirespecificX-featuretemplatesappliedtotheinputateverypossibleorientation,anyoneofwhichcanstimulateasinglerotation-invariantX-featurenode,toaccountforbottom-uprotationinvarianceinrecognition.Howeverinordertoalsoaccountfortop-downcompletionspecifictoorientation,top-downactivationofthehigher-levelinvariantnodewouldhavetofeedbackdowntoasetoftop-downprojectionnodes,eachofwhichisequippedwithanX-shapedprojectivetemplateataparticularorientation,abletoprojectacompleteX-shapedpatternontheinputfield.Butthetop-downcompletionmustselectonlythespecificorientationthatbestmatchesthepatternpresentintheinput,andcompletethepatternonlyatthatbestmatchingorientation.ThissystemthereforerequirestwocompletesetsofX-featurereceptivefieldsortemplates,onesetforbottom-uprecognitionandtheothersetfortop-downcompletion,eachsetcontainingX-featuretemplatesateverypossibleorientation,andsimilarsetsofreceptivefieldswouldberequiredfortherecognitionofothershapedpatternssuchas
WithregardtoPribram'sHolographictheory,theconceptofahologramiscloselyrelatedtoastandingwavemodel,sinceittooworksbyinterferenceofwaveforms.Thedifferenceisthatthehologramis
Thediscussionofalternativemodelswasindeedasignificantomissionintheversionofthepaperyoureviewed,thenextversionwillincludesuchadiscussion,whichinturnwillhelptoclarifytheoperationalprinciplesoftheHRtheory,anddistinguishitfromalternativeapproaches.
Insection(3)ofyourcritiqueyouproposethat
Insection(4)youcomplainthatthereisnodiscussionofthelimitationsinthescopeofHR.Forexamplemerelytoreflectoutsiderealitydoesnotcontributetotheproblemofconsciousawarenessoftheseobjects.HoweverthisissueisnotuniquetoHR,itisageneralphilosophicalissuethatappliesjustaswelltothealternativeNeuronDoctrinemodel.ButtheNeurondoctrineitselfcannotevenplausiblyaccountforthereflectionofoutsiderealityinaninternalrepresentation,duetotheproblemsofemergence,reification,andinvariance,whichiswhytheNeuronDoctrinesuggestsamoreabstractedconceptofvisualrepresentation,inwhichthevisualexperienceisencodedinafarmoreabstractedandabbreviatedform.ThereforealthoughHRdoesnotsolvethe
ProfessorGeissler'sResponse
ProfessorGeisslerkindlyrespondedtomyletterinApril2000tosaythatheagreedwithnearlyeverythingIhadsaid.Hethengavemeadviceaboutthepresentationoftheidea.HerecommendedthatIbeginbydescribingtheNeuronDoctrineindetail,andthenpointoutthelimitationsoftheideabeforepresentingtheHarmonicResonancetheoryasanalternative.Ire-wrotethepaperfollowingGeissler'sadvice,andIincludedsomeideasfromtheaboveletterinthenewversionofthepaper.HoweveritwastoolatetoresubmitittoPsychological
Reviewsincetheeditorwhowashandlingthepaperwasleaving.Furthermore,IambecomingconvincedthatthepropermediumforpresentingradicallynewanddifferenttheoriesistheopenpeerreviewformatoftheBehavioralandBrainSciencesjournal,whichiswhereIsubmittedtherevisedversionofthispaper.
6.
DearDr.S.Heller,
Attachedpleasetherevisedmanuscript
Thankyou.
SincerelyyoursGwo-JenHwang
InformationManagementDepartment
NationalChiNanUniversity
Pu-Li,Nan-Tou,Taiwan545,R.O.C.
FAX:
886-940503178
TEL:
886-915396558
ResponsetoReviewersandEditor
Paper#:
SMCC-03-06-0056
Title:
OntheDevelopmentofaComputer-AssistedTestingSystemwithGeneticTestSheet-GeneratingApproach
[Reviewer1Comments]:
____Thepapershouldbeshortened.
[ResponsetoReviewer1]:
Thepaperhasbeenshortenedto24pagesbyremovingsomeredundantdescriptionsofgeneticmodelsandalgorithms;moreover,Sections3and4havebeenre-writtentocondensetheentirepaper.
[Reviewer2Comments]:
Noinnovativecontributionwasfoundbothinthetheoryofgeneticalgorithmsandintheapplicationofthem.
[ResponsetoReviewer2]:
(1)_Wehavere-writtentheabstractandSections1and2toexplaintheimportanceabouttheconstructionofagoodtestsheet.Themajorcontributionofthispaperisnotinitstechnicalpart.Instead,wetriedtocopewithanimportantproblemarisingfromrealeducational
applications.Suchaproblemisknowntobecriticalandhasnotbeenefficiently
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 范文